Rtx 3060 Ti Vs 2080 Ti
Toll now 837$ Games supported 100% Price now 532$ Games supported 100% Comparison of graphics carte du jour architecture, market segment, value for money and other full general parameters. Value for money To get the alphabetize we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, specially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a hereafter computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards information technology'southward interface and motorcoach (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of memory installed: its blazon, size, omnibus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Notation that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and employ a shared part of arrangement RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, information in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may modify the number and blazon of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the bill of fare itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will evidence useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs. Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark operation is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark operation rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you detect some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems chop-chop. This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, role of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics bill of fare a thorough evaluation nether various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions ix, 10, xi and 12 (the final being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 criterion by Futuremark. It used 4 tests based on two scenes, 1 being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite existence done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level x benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. Information technology displays a few scenes of some weird infinite teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm criterion, information technology has been discontinued in Jan 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Dark Raid. Criterion coverage: 14% Fire Strike is a DirectX eleven benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two split tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly fabricated of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics carte benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on directly usage of GPU'due south processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Criterion coverage: nine% Geekbench five is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from xi dissimilar exam scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Criterion coverage: five% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 dissimilar test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on directly usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 5% Let's see how skilful the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per 2d in a large set up of popular games beyond different resolutions: +three.3% −3.3% +12.6% −12.6% +17.2% −17.2% +7.2% −7.2% −5.4% +5.four% −13.2% +13.2% −0.9% +0.9% −9.ix% +9.9% +148% −148% +5% −five% −29.4% +29.four% −9% +9% −9.9% +nine.nine% +three.8% −3.8% +12.3% −12.3% +32.three% −32.3% +17.four% −17.four% −five.four% +five.iv% −12.3% +12.3% −ane.9% +1.9% −eight.3% +8.3% +136% −136% +half dozen.ix% −6.9% −2.8% +2.viii% +i.1% −1.ane% −7.two% +7.two% +thirteen.3% −13.3% −10.1% +10.1% +9.3% −9.three% +viii.1% −8.one% +39.five% −39.five% −4.1% +four.1% −12.3% +12.3% −3.1% +3.1% −3% +3% +23.9% −23.nine% +16.ix% −sixteen.9% +84.1% −84.1% +113% −113% +2.2% −2.2% +15.2% −15.2% +10.five% −ten.5% +6.viii% −6.viii% +10.8% −10.8% +xi.7% −11.7% +36.seven% −36.7% +42.3% −42.three% +6.four% −six.four% +iv.3% −4.iii% −2% +2% +23.7% −23.vii% +11.half dozen% −eleven.half dozen% +23.ii% −23.ii% +1.9% −1.9% +18.6% −18.6% +10.5% −10.5% +eight.nine% −8.9% +21% −21% +11.i% −eleven.1% +15% −15% +32.3% −32.three% +196% −196% +xx% −xx% +xviii.5% −18.5% +iii.9% −3.9% +33.3% −33.3% Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti The differences in performance seem as well small. Should you nevertheless have questions concerning pick between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Exercise you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Similar" push button near your favorite graphics carte. Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 2080 Ti from AMD is Radeon RX 6800, which is slower past v% and lower by 3 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2080 Ti: The nearest GeForce RTX 3060 Ti'southward AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6800, which is faster past two% and higher by 1 position in our rating. Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 3060 Ti: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less shut to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Hither you tin see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on a scale of 1 to five: Charge per unit NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5: Here you lot can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or study an fault or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSRTX 2080 Ti vs RTX 3060 Ti
General info
Place in performance rating 14 eighteen Value for money 28.38 44.45 Compages Turing (2018−2021) Ampere (2020−2022) GPU code name Turing TU102 Ampere GA104 Marketplace segment Desktop Desktop Release appointment 27 August 2018 (3 years ago) 1 December 2020 (1 yr agone) Launch price (MSRP) $999 $399 Price now $837 (0.8x MSRP) $532 (1.3x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 4352 4864 Core clock speed 1350 MHz 1410 MHz Boost clock speed 1545 MHz 1665 MHz Number of transistors eighteen,600 million 17,400 one thousand thousand Manufacturing process engineering science 12 nm 8 nm Thermal blueprint power (TDP) 270 Watt 220 Watt Texture fill rate 420.2 253.one Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe four.0 x16 Length 267 mm 242 mm Width two-slot 2-slot Supplementary power connectors 2x viii-pin 1x 12-pin Retentiveness
Retentiveness type GDDR6 GDDR6 Maximum RAM amount xi GB 8 GB Memory bus width 352 Bit 256 Bit Retention clock speed 14000 MHz 14000 MHz Memory bandwidth 616.0 GB/southward 448.0 GB/southward Shared memory - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort HDMI + + G-SYNC back up + no information Technologies
API back up
DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_1) 12 Ultimate (12_2) Shader Model 6.v 6.five OpenGL 4.6 4.6 OpenCL 2.0 two.0 Vulkan 1.2.131 1.2 CUDA 7.5 viii.6 Benchmark performance
Overall score
Gaming performance
Full Hd 165 144 1440p 121 92 4K ninety 60
Low Preset
Medium Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
Loftier Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 125 121 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 107 95 Battlefield 5 170 145 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare seventy−75 65−70 Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 78 Far Cry v 136 154 Far Cry New Dawn 110 111 Forza Horizon 4 182 200 Hitman three 171 65−70 Horizon Zero Dawn 146 139 Ruby Dead Redemption ii 119 154 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 144 157 Watch Dogs: Legion 111 122
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 108 104 Assassinator's Creed Valhalla 91 81 Battlefield 5 164 124 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 81 65−70 Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 78 Far Cry 5 130 146 Far Weep New Dawn 106 108 Forza Horizon iv 181 196 Hitman 3 163 65−seventy Horizon Zero Dawn 124 116 Metro Exodus 107 110 Red Dead Redemption two ninety 89 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 139 149 The Witcher 3: Wild Chase 247 218 Watch Dogs: Legion 99 109
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 82 75 Assassin's Creed Valhalla fourscore 74 Battlefield 5 159 114 Cyberpunk 2077 seventy−75 77 Far Cry 5 122 137 Far Cry New Dawn 96 99 Forza Horizon iv 168 173 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135 109 Watch Dogs: Legion xc 77
Call of Duty: Mod Warfare 127 65−seventy Hitman 3 147 65−70 Horizon Naught Dawn 94 92 Metro Exodus 76 66 Red Dead Redemption 2 63 57 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110 103
Assassin'southward Creed Odyssey 72 65 Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla 67 threescore Battlefield 5 134 98 Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 52 Far Cry 5 117 110 Far Cry New Dawn 98 94 Forza Horizon 4 147 150 Watch Dogs: Legion 73 59
Call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare 77 65−lxx Hitman 3 85 65−70 Horizon Zippo Dawn 54 53 Metro Exodus 51 43 Ruby-red Dead Redemption 2 42 38 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 61 56 The Witcher 3: Wild Chase 98 81
Assassin'south Creed Odyssey 50 45 Assassinator'due south Creed Valhalla 46 xl Battlefield 5 86 65 Cyberpunk 2077 seventy−75 25 Far Weep 5 78 65 Far Cry New Dawn 77 65 Forza Horizon 4 107 103 Watch Dogs: Legion 44 33 Advantages and disadvantages
Functioning rating 73.55 68.62 Novelty 27 August 2018 1 December 2020 Cost $999 $399 Retentivity bus width 352 256 Memory bandwidth 616 448 Pipelines / CUDA cores 4352 4864 Flake lithography 12 nm 8 nm Thermal design ability (TDP) 270 Watt 220 Watt
Cast your vote
Competitors of GeForce RTX 2080 Ti by AMD
Competitors of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti by AMD
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-2080-Ti-vs-GeForce-RTX-3060-Ti
0 Response to "Rtx 3060 Ti Vs 2080 Ti"
Post a Comment